The concord is made of the Latin concord, concors, which are both “agree” and are in com, which means “together,” and cord, kor-, which means “heart.” Literally translating the Latin terms united as “hearts together,” which gives a reason why the first meanings of English concord are “a state of concordance,” “harmony” and “agreement.” The word “agreement by measure, compact or covenant” is as follows, and over time, the Concorde refers to a treaty that establishes peace and friendly relations between peoples or nations. Thus, two countries can sign a concord in cases that have given rise to hostilities in the past and live in peace and harmony. In the case of use such as nostantiv, the agreement refers to a formal agreement under which countries or groups enter into an agreement in which all parties involved agree to a common objective or objective. An agreement is a convergence of common opinions and motivations, with each group agreeing on the same result. An example of this would be a peace agreement in which participating countries could agree to end an international conflict or disagreement. There are several reasons why an otherwise valid and agreed treaty can be rejected as a binding international convention, most of which pose problems related to contract formation. [Citation required] For example, the Japan-Korea treaties of 1905, 1907 and 1910, which ended in series, were protested;  and they were declared “null and void” in the 1965 Treaty on Fundamental Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea.  In international law and international relations, a protocol is generally an international treaty or agreement that complements a previous treaty or international agreement. A protocol may modify the previous contract or add additional provisions.
The parties to the previous agreement are not required to adopt the protocol. This sometimes becomes more evident by calling it an “optional protocol,” especially if many parties to the first agreement do not support the protocol. In addition to treaties, there are other less formal international agreements. These include efforts such as the Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) and the G7 Global Partnership Against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Although the PSI has a “declaration of prohibition principles” and the G7 Global Partnership includes several statements by G7 heads of state and government, it also does not have a legally binding document that sets specific obligations and is signed or ratified by member states. a country that will reach an agreement with another country, which it will work together to help each other, especially in a war The IHR (2005) is an international agreement between 194 States Parties and the World Health Organization to monitor, report and respond to any events that could pose a threat to international public health. The objective of the IHR (2005) is to prevent, protect, control and respond to a public health response to the spread of diseases internationally, in a manner adapted to public health risks, limited to them, avoiding unnecessary intervention in international transport and trade. (International Health Regulations, Article 2). For more information, please see THE LA fact sheets. An essential part of treaty drafting is that the signing of a treaty implies recognition, that the other party is a sovereign state and that the agreement, considered to be under international law, is applicable.
Therefore, nations can be very cautious when it comes to qualifying a treaty agreement. In the United States, for example, interstate agreements are pacts and agreements between states and the federal government or between government authorities are statements of intent. Accord appears in ancient English with the meaning of “reconciling” or “concording,” borrowed from his Anglo-French etymon, acorder, a word akin to Latin concord, which means “consent.” This original sense of concordance is transitory, and in modern English it still occurs, but rarely.